PREVIOUS PAGE
JUNE 10, 2008
With winter set in, I'm really noticing how weak the light
is, and that's affecting my fast exposures. So I've slowed my exposures
down to 640th second. Unfortunately, slowing the ducks down is
not an option so I'm getting a bit of motion blur, but that's the
price you pay for some decent depth of field without also pushing
up the noise levels.
I'm getting better at tracking fast-moving
birds in the viewfinder now and this time I was able to give
the camera a decent chance at focusing. But I'm still too slow
at hitting the shutter button.
Only a couple of ducks this day, but I was
pretty happy with this one. Nice and sharp at full resolution:

Now I'm not saying I've become obsessed by
this task or anything like that. I consider it absolutely normal
to wake up in the mornings wondering, 'Is this the day I get
that waterskiing duck?'

MAY 26, 2008
I was having a run of bad shots and then found myself back
at work again, talking about my pursuit of the holy-grail shot.
My friends at work are very much used to this kind of talk from
me. They're really nice about it and nod their heads politely,
and you'd swear they were listening too. I'm thinking, forget about
getting another camera - what I need is a place where ducks fly
in regularly, in a neat line, one by one. Preferably all day. Like
planes do at airports. That way I'd be sure to get at least one
shot that worked out. One of my friends suggested I should get
my girlfriend to stand outside of the frame and hurl the ducks
in one at a time. That might get around some technical problems
but I've sworn a pledge that no ducks will be hurt in my pursuit
of my holy-grail photo.

But I got one okay shot this day (above). It's
not perfect because it's a bit out of focus. But I like the heroic
stance of that bird (White-eyed Duck)
MAY 19, 2008
I was talking about waterskiing ducks with some friends.
Well okay, it's pretty much all I'm talking about these days and
Soapy, a Canadian artist friend of mine, asks me if the ducks ever
dig their toes in when they land. He figured that if they accidentally
dug their toes into the water at high speed they'd end up flipping
face down into the water.
So I'm thinking a lot about Soapy's question
and then by a stroke of luck I find the beginnings of an answer
in this shot of a duck lining itself up for a water landing:

So that's your answer right there, Soapy. This
duck is approaching at high speed. You can tell it's going fast
because its wing feathers are all bent back by the air pressure
as it decelerates. And look what it's doing to those toes. I'll
show them at higher resolution to make it easier for you:
 |
 |
The duck's toes and claws
are clearly curled right up, like the front of a water ski.
That's why they don't trip over on the water |
No doubting what's going on there. That duck
knows what it's doing. Now have another look at it, I mean the
whole bird. I can't say this for sure, but I reckon that bird
is deep in concentration. I mean, what if one foot hits the water
before the other. That would flip it around sideways and you'd
have a duck doing donuts instead of a ski run. So it has to get
it just right. And I thought I was the one who had a lot to remember.
I took a bunch more pics. The lighting wasn't
good - everything was harsh and back-lit - but the ducks were
coming in at an impressive rate and I was getting in some practice.




It turns out that my favourite ducks are the Pacific
Blacks. They seem to be the ones that come in fastest and
therefore ski the longest. Unlike this guy in the series show
below:
 |
 |
At 6 frames a second this
sequence of four shots took only two thirds of a second.
By the way, this pic is another one that shows the toes curled
up, ready to prevent it being flipped over. At this point
the bird is concentrating on a level landing |
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
The bird is fully level now |
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
This is pretty much the part of the sequence
I'm aiming for. Shame it's so blurred |
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
... and a sixth of a second later the
party's over. This landing was a pretty unimpressive waterski,
but it shows how precise you have to be with your timing |
So now I know where this is heading. At this
point, a serious photographer would get some serious camera gear,
with a good fast lens and much faster burst rate.
But that's taking all the fun out of it.
MAY
12, 2008
That last shot put a real spring in my step and suddenly I'm
more keen than ever to get my holy-grail shot. So I was back at the
pond with my 400mm lens ready and watching for flying ducks. And
then this guy turned up. This is no duck but, like the swan its size
made it an easy photographic target. So I'm firing a burst of shots
thinking it's going to have to stop sooner or later. It more than
filled the frame before it slowed down and this was the last shot
I got in the sequence. I love this shot. Like I said, it's not a
duck, but the pic shows what impressive big birds those pelicans
are. The full-resolution shot looks really cool.

MAY
9, 2008
This time I was just so close. The light was a million times
better that day. Focus was pin-sharp. Framing good. But once again
I was a bit slow with the shutter finger and the bird was fully
settled into the water before I got my first shot. But there's
enough stuff working in this pic for me to really like it. It's
not the holy-grail shot, but at high resolution (much bigger than
it looks here) it looks beautiful, especially those frozen-moment
curled-water effects. Definitely another keeper:

MAY
6, 2008
I've jumped a whole bunch of days. No need to show you my
pics. Just a bunch of blurred ducks. But then the craziest thing
happened - I got my first wasterski shot which I was (and still
am) happy with. Except it wasn't a duck...
I was standing by the pond wating for ducks
and noticed this black swan heading for a water landing. After
weeks of practicing on small, fast-moving ducks, getting my camera
focused on this great giant of a bird was dead easy. I like this
shot. The bird and water are nice and sharp even at 100% resolution,
and you can see what's happening.

Sure, it's not the shot I wanted but I'll keep
it. And it's given me a bit of confidence and it's around about
this point when I see a duck approaching. I've been learning
how to use my camera but I'm not quite fast enough. Despite getting
the focus right the duck has already settled into the water:

The lighting's not great but I'll keep this
shot too. I'm definitely getting better at this.
APRIL
4, 2008
THIS IS HOW DUCKS WORK: When you first
see a duck approaching it's usually less than a hundred metres
away.
Ducks fly really fast, which is why they do
the best waterski landings. Chances are they'll be landing in
front of you within a couple of seconds and the whole game's
over in less than a second after that. So I'm talking maybe three
seconds.
THIS IS HOW I WORK: I see
the duck approaching about a hundred metres away so I aim the
camera and realise I can't see the duck through the viewfinder.
Because the duck has moved - fast, and my 400mm lens only shows
a small part of the sky.
If I'm lucky I'll find the duck before it's
hit the water. Then I've got my finger on the viewfinder trying
to focus and that takes a bit more time. By now I'm panicking
because the duck's still blurred. I'm struggling to keep the
bird in the frame which means the camera is struggling to focus.
To get everything framed and focused this way probably takes
me about three and a half seconds.
Three seconds for the duck. Three and a half
for me. When you do the maths it's not looking good.
So after waiting at the pond for a while I
see my first duck. It's coming in from the side at an approach
velocity of about warp nine. I barely manage to fire off two
shots before it's all over:


Just like the first time - the spray's in focus
but the duck is blurred. Except this time the duck is mostly
outside the frame. This was when I realised that unless I lift
my technical skill levels I'm going to need a lot of luck.
APRIL
1, 2008
I'm a big fan of ducks. And an especially big fan of how they land on water after
flying. They have this really cool way of slowing down. They stick their feet
out and waterski across the surface for a bit before they sink into the water.
Sometimes they ski for about 6 feet or more. They do it really well and I have
a hunch they enjoy it. And I wanted to catch that moment in a photograph.
Easier said than done.

The illustration above shows the shot I want.
For a brief moment after landing on water they're not flying
and they're not swimming either. They're waterskiing. I can't
think of anything else you could call it. I'm not making this
up and duck experts around the world will back me up on this.
I figured it would be great to get a shot of
this brief moment. And I almost have too. On my very first attempt
I came awfully close. And looking back on that day I can't believe
how lucky I (almost) was. Because so far, this has been the closest
I've managed to get to that elusive shot. Although my shots are
also getting better...
You see, I headed for the pond where the ducks
hang out and no sooner had I turned on my camera when I saw a
duck flying towards me at high speed. I barely had time to find
it in my viewfinder before it was on the water skiing to a halt
in front of me. Here's the shot I managed to fire off before
it was all over:

So now you'll see what I'm talking about now.
There's the duck waterskiing. No denying it. You'll notice the
long trail of spray behind him going right out of the frame.
That spray's in sharp focus, but the duck is badly blurred. Maybe
it looks alright small like I have it shown above, but when you
blow it up onscreen it looks dreadful.
 |
 |
Here's that pic at 50% resolution
(half-size). I got the water in focus but the duck is badly
blurred |
I think this was the shot that got me hooked.
It showed that it could be done, and because I got so close on
that first moment of trying I got a false impression of how difficult
it was.
PREVIOUS PAGE
HOME |